|
|
Moretown Quarry Proposal Threatens Neighborhood
Serenity, Safety & Property
Values
Background
- May 17,2004, Waitsfield resident Rich Rivers submitted an
application for a stone mining and crushing operation on land he owns
in the heart
of the
lower Mad River neighborhood. Entrance to this proposed quarry is less
than 1 mile south of the Ward Swimming hole on 100B.
- December 10, 2004, The Moretown Development
Review Board (DRB) denied this application. Click here for
addtional information.
- January 7, 2005, Rivers Development, LLC appealed the DRB decision
to the Environmental Court.
- October 18, 2005 - Rivers Development filed his Act 250 application.
- January 19, 2007 - The District Commission denied Rivers
Development's request for the Moretown Rock Quarry. They denied this
permit based on Criterion 1(air) and Criterion 10 (Town Plan). Click here for
additional information.
- March 29, 2007 - After receiving two District Commission
denials of his Act250 permit, Rivers Development LLC filed a Notice of
Appeal, Statement of Questions and Notice to Activate Docket # 7-0-05-Vtec
with the Environmental Court. Click here to
get latest information on the appeal process.
Mr.
Rivers has long been a respected member of the community. He is friend
to several neighbors near the site. We know of no one who thinks ill of
Rich personally and all understand that his right to pursue the use of
his property, as he sees fit, should be respected and protected, as long
as it does not adversely affect the quality of life and the value of the
community and his neighbors’ health, peace and property values.
There are unfortunately, many reasons why Mr. Rivers' industrial mining
operation plan is in conflict with those tenets and the town plan’s
specified use for this agricultural / residential community. Fortunately,
there are alternate uses for the land that can protect Mr. Rivers from
suffering loss on his investment to date. To learn more, please read on.
General Concerns
Many members of the community and outside experts have
expressed concern about this rock mining quarry for the following reasons:
- Increased traffic on 100B
- A maximum of 108 truck trips a day (average of 72) would represent a huge
increase in truck traffic. This was an issue specifically noted in the
town plan
as already a threat to the safety and recreational enjoyment of the corridor
at
current traffic
levels. Raising truck traffic would greatly reduce the safety of the
corridor
for motorists, bikers, hikers, in-line skaters, horse riders, fishermen
and wildlife (ironically, Mr. River’s parents struck and killed
a bear on route 100B in 2002 very near the site of the proposed
quarry).
- Noise
- According to authorities, rock crushing operations generate noise equivalent
to a locomotive. That means that residents within the 100B
corridor will be subjected to the constant noise of the crusher during
all hours of operation. In addition, the noise of loaded dump trucks braking
to
enter and accelerating
when leaving the site will echo up and down the valley. Trucks leaving
Moretown village 2 miles away from the site can clearly be heard by neighbors
today,
which indicates that the mining trucks will be heard from the village
to beyond the swimming hole.
The instantaneous
noise of drill startup and truck loading will make operation of the neighboring
horse facilities dangerous.
- Blasting
- Mr. Rivers conducted test blasts in the summer of 2003. Mrs Holden,
the closest neighbor, had her home shake from the test.
The applicant's own blasting expert testified that it would not be safe
for the Holdens to be outside on their property during
blasts. Also, during the test blast, a horseback rider at Sainsbury’s
stable found herself on top of a suddenly running and bucking mount. Several
horses at Gould’s
(a mile from the site) ran through their fences along 100B. Some required
veterinary
care for
injuries received. Riders at Mad River Stable could not ride for considerable
time
due to the agitation of their horses. Dogs at Sainsbury’s Labrador Kennel
were greatly scared. If blasting continues on a regular basis, it is highly
questionable whether these current residential and business operations
could safely continue.
- Water pollution
- Several neighbors have wells in proximity to the operation that may be
affected. Ground and surface water pollution could affect the Mad River.
The site is only a few hundred yards uphill from the river, and only a
mile upstream from the Ward Fishing
and Swim park.
- Air pollution
- The site clearing, bulldozing, drilling, blasting, rock
crushing and diesel trucks can produce great amounts of air pollution
that would settle in the valley. Frequent weather
inversions will trap these
pollutants impacting the health of the community.
- Property Values
- Based on input from realtors and appraisers, the sights and sounds of
the operation and its impact on safety and serenity in the valley will
have a devastating impact on
the value of the properties
near the site -- and potentially on those in the entire lower Mad River
community as the quarry site is located along one of the most scenic
sectors of the Mad River.
- Alternative Use
- When Mr. Rivers initially visited his neighbors about the uses of his land,
he spoke about a limited number of home sites, and selling off the stone
and timber that would be yielded when the home sites and roads were created.
During the Act 250 process, Mr. Rivers filed results
of a soil test that indicates there is septic capacity for 10 to
twelve homes. Mr. Rivers has proven himself over and over to be an exceptional
home builder with an excellent reputation. This and other possible solutions
are likely available to Mr. Rivers to ensure that he
profits from his
investment in the land.
How to Help
- Make a donation so that experts can be
hired and data can be obtained.
- Offer to help with gathering information,
fundraising and building awareness.
- Bookmark this site, or sign
up for the MRNA e-mail list to stay abreast.
Thank You! |